Android on iPhone??

Sure it’s an outrageous idea. But…

  1. Google and Apple cooperate in many areas.
  2. The CEO of Google is on Apple’s board.
  3. Google has no desire to compete with Apple. Selling gadgets isn’t part of Google’s business plan. It’s in the information/advertising business. Apple is in the gadget business.
  4. Android phones will allegedly be available in the second half of 2008.

Steve Jobs is apparently revealing the next version of iPhone on June 9 for sale end/June or early/July.
What if the next iPhone was a dual-OS system, with both Mac and Android?

Sure, it’s unlikely, especially since ATT, currently the only carrier in the U.S. authorized to use the iPhone, just recently said they were looking at offering Android phones.
And two operating systems on a cellphone might be too cumbersome and space-demanding.

An iPhone that also runs Android would be a true killer. It would also possibly piss off a lot of hardware manufacturers who are involved in the Open Handset Alliance. But Android is supposedly available for, and to, anyone, and those manufacturers too will have their chance to turn out stunning Android-equipped handsets. By the very concept of the OHA, no company should/will be restricted from using Android, whether they’re currently members of OHA or not. So Apple could hardly be not allowed to use Android.

Offering an Android Too version would make Apple’s iPhone a must have, and absolutely cause sales of the iPhone, currently declining, to explode.

Are there technical obstacles? Probably. Not my area.

But wouldn’t it be cool?

UPDATE: June 11, 2008

Well, the fact that Android on the iPhone was a far-fetched idea was confirmed by Steve Job’s info on the new iPhone 3G. Nevertheless, I haven’t given up on the idea and was intrigued to notice someone on one of the techie websites hoping that someone writes an application that allows iPhone to run the Linux-based Android platform.

Book Review - World Made by Hand

World Made by Hand - a Novel

Author: James Howard Kunstler
336 pages
ISBN: 0-87113-978-2
2008, Atlantic Monthly Press
www.worldmadebyhand.com

This book could more precisely, but less poetically, be named “World Made by Kunstler”. Author and Peak Oil commentator James Howard Kunstler has written a novel that brings to life a community and world that Kunstler himself has created. It’s not just any creation, however, because what he has created is informed by his many years of study of our society, its built environment, and the Peak Oil threat.

As a novel it’s entertaining and interesting. As a demonstration of Kunstler’s vision for the post-Peak Oil future, it’s vivid and compelling. Kunstler imagines a time where all systems have broken down because of Peak Oil, climate change, economic collapse, apparent nuclear war—a number of U.S. cities are gone—and, of course, famine and pestilence. In short, it’s a world ravaged by the Four Horsemen and a bunch of their close friends.

Needless to say, things aren’t quite the same after all this. Kunstler’s protagonist, Robert Earle, moved with his wife to her home town of Union Grove in upstate New York after “the bomb went off in Los Angeles”. Robert, a former software marketing executive whose job became rather superfluous, now supports himself as a carpenter, living alone while grieving for his dead wife and daughter, and his long-missing son.

His community is not thriving, but it is surviving. Nearby is another sort of community, run by wealthy and enterprising land-owner Stephen Bullock, who has created his own fiefdom, a plantation where industrious workers labor in the various farm and manufacturing enterprises their “manor lord” has created. It is a totally self-contained community, as sustainable on its own resources as was any such community in early 1800s America. That is, it still depends on trade with the outside for the things it cannot grow or make itself.

Into the town of Union Grove comes a sizable religious sect—the “New Faithers”—led by Brother Jobe, a charismatic and increasingly mysterious leader who purchases the town’s former high school as a center for his flock. That flock is interesting in itself, being decidedly non-pacifist and equally non-puritanical.

Another community just outside of town is led by Wayne Karp, who with his hardcore biker followers has taken over the town’s former refuse dump, and now “mines” it for salvage materials. With these four examples of possible post-Peak Oil communities—small town New England, religious sect, back-to-the-1800s plantation dwellers, and hard-drinking Mad Max ex-bikers—the scene is now set for Kunstler to lead his protagonist Robert through what is in effect a coming-of-(a new)-age novel for both Robert and his town.

Kunstler suggests that all of these types of communities are likely to occur in the not-distant future, although he obviously favors the small town community that by the end of the novel comes together stronger and closer, experiencing a simpler and more meaningful life. It’s democracy with a little “d”, in which people work out problems because it’s too destructive to their community if they don’t. It’s also a restoration of an earlier America.

Union Grove is hardly a utopia, and Kunstler has no illusions that creating—or ending up with—such a community is an easy thing. But as his other writings also show, he does believe that such communities can be brought about in this real world, preferably earlier than later.

Kunstler has spent many years justifiably ranting about the anti-human aspects of our suburbs, the destruction of our cities, and the resulting decline in our civility and way of life. He has emerged as a major, and very vocal, spokesman for the Peak Oil movement; one who calls on us all to repent, mend our ways and forsake our dependence on “Happy Motoring” and the strip mall cul-de-sac suburbs that have resulted.

Now Kunstler has written a novel—I’d call it more a novella, a moving snapshot—of what he envisions may be our future. Despite a couple of bizarre scenes which remain frustratingly undeveloped, and a line or two of dialogue fraught with a meaning that is never revealed (although perhaps other, smarter readers than I will decipher them)—he has created a vivid depiction of what he envisions may be, can be, and should be, our future.

Just as the communities are varied, so are the book’s characters. Kunstler has tempered his usual neo-Gonzo writing style and created interesting characters with depth and complexity who inhabit a world which is described quite lyrically at times. There are no stereotypes here; the “good” guys have flaws, the “bad” guys have their strengths. World Made By Hand is well worth reading. After you read this book, you can decide which, if any, of those communities you’d like to work toward. And if none of them, you may at least see more clearly your own image of the future.

Kunstler has taken a major step by providing us with a detailed vision of a very possible future. It gives us a starting place for a very important, and long avoided, discussion. Give it a read.

Mick Winter (www.DryDipstick.com) is the author of Peak Oil Prep: Prepare for Peak Oil, Climate Change and Economic Collapse (www.peakoilprep.com)

Movie Review - After the Peak: The End of Cheap Oil

After the Peak - The End of Cheap Oil
27 minute DVD
www.afterthepeak.com

After the Peak is a mock-TV news program. It’s presented as if live from a local television station in North Carolina, with anchors in the studio reporting and talking to reporters in the field. And, yes, there’s even the obligatory sports guy.

The time is “one year from today”. Worldwide oil production has peaked and is declining. It’s still early in the Peak Oil saga with gasoline usually available, but prices are going up. Oil is now $195 a barrel and prices at the pump average $10.29 a gallon, seriously affecting people’s lives, their businesses and their commutes.

The movie very clearly brings home the effect of the early stages of Peak Oil. This is not a film of starvation, the end of air travel, or the collapse of world trade and civil order. In other words, this is not a pictorial version of scenarios such as those imagined by people such as James Howard Kunstler in his new novel “World Made By Hand”. But it is a picture of every day life for every day citizens as they try to deal with the cost of the fossil fuel on which their lives and livelihoods depend.

Most of the focus is on the cost of transportation, but other resulting problems become apparent. Shoppers start to discover food shortages in the local stores, homes distant from town are declining in value, and some farmers are shutting down. Local government and school districts are struggling with increasing fuel costs. The sheriff’s office is conducting fewer patrols; the school district has cut back on school bus service and eliminated high school sports.

After the Peak uses interviews to make its point, and its interviewees include a college professor, motorists at a local gas station and the station’s owner (who has hired an armed guard), and local officials and business owners.

Instead of breaking to commercials between news reports, the film cleverly breaks to well presented information on oil production statistics. The information is very clear and very appropriate.

As producer/writer Jim McQuaid has said, After the Peak is not aimed at the Peak Oil-aware audience, but rather at those who have little or no awareness of oil depletion at all. It’s intended to show a likely future through the eyes of a medium that most people are very familiar with—the evening news.

This is a film that should stimulate discussions in households and gatherings around the country. Show it to some friends and neighbors who know nothing about Peak Oil and see what their reaction is. And then be prepared for some serious, very concerned, questions. If they have none, we may be in even more trouble than many of us think.

Job Market 2009

Just because we’re losing jobs doesn’t mean there isn’t hope in the future. Watch the video.

Irony Upon Irony - Former Jewel of the Empire buys former symbols of the Empire

Empires come. Empires go. If there’s any doubt that the British Empire is long past–and the American Empire headed downhill–it’s dispelled in this article in today’s New York Times:
Ford Sells Luxury Brands for $1.7 Billion.

Ford Motor Company, once great automobile company in the former British colony now known as the United States, is selling the Jaguar and Land Rover brands that once belonged to England, the former homeland of the British Empire, to new owner Tata Motors Limited, of Mumbai, in a country once known as the Jewel of the British Empire and better known these days as simply “India”. It must be very sweet for Tata and the Indian nation as a whole. The 1.7 billion is roughly a third of the $5.2 billion Ford had paid to buy the brands.

Tata had recently announced that it would be soon selling the Tata Nano, the world’s cheapest car, priced at $2,500.

Our Nomination for the Most Useful Column on Wine Ever Written

This column was in the Napa Valley Register. It’s by Ed Schwartz, who writes for the Nob Hill Gazette in San Francisco, and is a long-time public relations guy in the wine industry.

Dan Berger of Sonoma County has for long been one of our heroes of wine writing for his no-nonsense columns.

But I’ve got to admit that this column by Ed is a classic. And probably the most helpful guide to wine I’ve ever read.

Here’s the column, covering everything from aging to wine pairing: After 40 years in wine - here’s all I know.

European Think Tank Predicts Collapse of US Economy by End of Third Quarter 2008

If you’re feeling cheery today, here’s a little untonic that should ground you a bit.

“…we are now resolutely stepping into an era with no historical precedent. Our researchers insisted on that many times in the last two years: any comparison with the previous crises of our modern economy would be fallacious. It is neither a “remake” of the 1929 crisis nor a repetition of the 1970s oil crises or 1987 stock market crisis. It is truly a global systemic crisis, that is to say a crisis affecting the entire planet and questioning the very foundations of the international system upon which the world was organised in the last decades.”

Global systemic crisis / September 2008 - Phase of collapse of US real economy

Note from Chicken Little: Since this is a public announcement, I’m assuming it’s okay to publish it in full. For much more detailed information, you’ll find it necessary to subscribe to their regular journal, which is 200 euros a year.

You can do this at LEAP/E2020.

ABOUT GEAB:

Each month, the GlobalEurope Anticipation Bulletin brings you its unique analyses on the upcoming stages of the collapse of the world order created after 1945, as well as numerous strategic recommendations for your decisions in the political, economic and financial fields.
Because in our complex world, all these dimensions are interconnected and command developments across sectors.

The GlobalEurope Anticipation Bulletin is the confidential letter of think-tank LEAP/Europe 2020. As such, our aim is to provide our readers with state-of-the-art analyses of geo-political anticipation centered around the study and follow-up of the global systemic crisis, itself focussed on the evolution of the dollar and of the US economy, and their impact on international economy and financial markets, all that seen from a European perspective:

* Global systemic crisis Watch
* Analysis of chosen aspects of the political, economic and financial news
* Identification of relevant indicators, analysis of trends, anticipation of evolutions
* Follow-up of dollar, US economy, global economy, financial markets,…; anticipation of evolutions
* Implications of the crisis on security and defense, politics, public opinon…
* Identification of future-bearer leads
* Investment councel
* Indicator of opinion (GlobalEurometre)


And, finally, here’s their latest public announcement:

GEAB N°22 is available! Global systemic crisis / September 2008 - Phase of collapse of US real economy
- Public announcement GEAB N°22 (February 16, 2008) -

According to LEAP/E2020, the end of the third quarter of 2008 will be marked by a new tipping point in the unfolding of the global systemic crisis. At that time indeed, the cumulated impact of the various sequences of the crisis (see table below) will reach its maximum strength and affect decisively the very heart of the systems concerned, on the frontline of which the United States, epicentre of the current crisis. In the United States, this new tipping point will translate into a collapse of the real economy, final socio-economic stage of the serial bursting of the housing and financial bubbles (1) and of the pursuance of the US dollar fall. The collapse of US real economy means the virtual freeze of the American economic machinery: private and public bankruptcies in large numbers, companies and public services closing down massively (2),…

A revealing harbinger: from March 2008 onward, the US government will stop a service publishing its economic indicators due to budget restrictions (3). Those who read the GEAB N°2 (02/2006) and included Alert certainly keep in mind our anticipation which connected the upcoming fall of the US dollar with the US Fed’s decision to cease publishing the M3 indicator. This new decision is another clear sign that US leaders are now anticipating a very bleak economic outlook for their country.

Time perspective of the seven sequences of the impact phase of the global systemic crisis as anticipated since mid-2007 - Source LEAP/E2020, GEAB N°18 (10/2007)

In this 22nd issue of the GEAB, LEAP/E2020’s experts try in particular to anticipate very specifically what will come out of the collapse of the US real economy for the United States themselves and for the other regions of the world. Meanwhile our team presents five sets of strategic and operational recommendations helping to protect oneself from the upcoming deterioration of the global systemic crisis.

On the occasion of the second anniversary of the publication of our famous “Global systemic crisis Alert” which toured the world in February 2006 (4), LEAP/E2020 wishes to remind that we are now resolutely stepping into an era with no historical precedent. Our researchers insisted on that many times in the last two years: any comparison with the previous crises of our modern economy would be fallacious. It is neither a “remake” of the 1929 crisis nor a repetition of the 1970s oil crises or 1987 stock market crisis. It is truly a global systemic crisis, that is to say a crisis affecting the entire planet and questioning the very foundations of the international system upon which the world was organised in the last decades.

According to LEAP/E2020, it is also instructive to observe that, two years after the release of this « Alert » which at the time generated both the interest of millions of readers worldwide and the condescending irony of most « experts » and « managers » of the economic and financial spheres, everyone is now convinced that a crisis is truly happening, that it is really global, and for most people already that it could indeed be systemic. However, it is always a repeated astonishment for our team to see the degree of incapacity of these same experts and managers in understanding the specific nature of the phenomenon currently unfolding. According to them, this crisis would only be a usual crisis but bigger. As a matter of fact that’s how the financial media reflect the dominant interpretations of the ongoing crisis. According to our team, this approach is not only intellectually lazy (5), it is also morally guilty, because it has for a main consequence to prevent their readers (whether they are simple citizens, private investors or public or private organisation managers) from preparing for the upcoming shocks (6).

For this reason, in opposition to all what can be read in the mainstream media always eager to conceal the truth and serve the interests of those who rule them, LEAP/E2020 wishes to remind that it is first and foremost in the United States that the systemic crisis is taking an unprecedented shape (the « Very Great US Depression » as our team decided to call it in January 2007 (7)) because it is around this country, and this country alone, that the world got progressively organised after the second World War. The various issues of the GEAB extensively described this situation. In short, it appears to be useful to make clear that neither Europe nor Asia have a negative saving rate, a full-scale housing crisis throwing millions of citizens out of their homes, a free-falling currency, abysmal public and trade deficits, an economic recession and, on top of all this, a number of costly wars to finance.

Neither Asia nor Europe (or more precisely ‘nor the Eurozone’) will suffer the roughest, the most sustainable and the most negative impact of the ongoing crisis; but the United States will, as well as all the countries/economies strongly linked to the US (what our experts have decided to call “the American risk”) (8). A “decoupling” is indeed taking place between the US economy and the other large regions of the world. But “decoupling” does not mean “independence” and it is clear that, as anticipated by LEAP/E2020 for many months, Asia and Europe will be affected by the crisis. But « decoupling » entails that the evolution of the US economy and of the other large regions of the world are no longer synchronised, that Asia and Europe are now moving along courses no longer determined by the US economy.

The global systemic crisis is in fact the beginning of an economic « decoupling » between the US and the rest of the world, knowing that the non « decoupled » economies will be dragged down the US negative spiral.

US Self-Employment in a Steep Downturn - Source Bureau of Labor Statistics / Merril Lynch (shaded region represents period of US recession)

The cases of the housing (2006) and financial (2007) bubble-bursting are eloquent. Indeed, the large majority of operators (non-specialised in the concerned sector) discovered that « the party was over » a long time after the trend had reversed. During the entire reversal period (which usually lasts between 6 to 12 months at most), dominant stances kept repeating them that nothing was changing and that emerging worries had no reason to be; and later, that the problems would remain confined to the sector concerned and to the US only. All those who, in the US and elsewhere, listened to these arguments are bitterly regretful now that they are stuck with unmarketable houses (or about to be foreclosed) or now that they see the value of their assets crumble day after day (9).

Concerning stock markets, our team has anticipated since October 2007 that international stocks would plummet by 20 to 60 percent according to the region in the course of the year 2008. Today, we must re-evaluate our anticipations as we estimate that losses will be even greater than that. Indeed, on the one hand, stock markets have already lost between 10 and 20 percent since the beginning of the year (10), and, on the other hand, the collapse of the real economy in the US by the end of Summer 2008 will drag down all stock markets. According to LEAP/E2020, international stock markets will probably drop by 50 percent in average compared to 2007 (including in the emerging countries) (11).

This sort of re-evaluation is typical of the work of anticipation carried by LEAP/E2020. Month after month we try to distinguish which trends are growing and which are relenting in order to improve the accuracy of our evaluations. We do not strive to “be right” (12), not to “sell” or “promote” anything. We seek simply and without prejudice to describe in advance the consequences of the heavy trends at play in this 21st-century world, and to share with our readers what we think are the proper means to protect oneself from the most negative effects.

In this 22nd issue of the Global Europe Anticipation Bulletin, with the alert we sound about a collapse of US real economy from September 2008 onward, we are trying again to warn those concerned that this major event will generate many very severe socio-political troubles in the United States (13) whose economy is truly on a tumbling course (14), a situation extremely likely to entail very heavy consequences for the financial and monetary markets, and for the world’s economy. We have not yet reached the heart of the crisis. According to LEAP/E2020, we will be there in the second semester of 2008.

———-
Notes:

(1) A very instructive film was recently nominated at the Sundance Film Festival: I.O.U.S.A., directed by Patrick Creadon. As it follows the journey of David Walker, US Comptroller General (and therefore responsible for controlling federal public spending), during a series of conferences on the state of public expenditures throughout the country, this film shows the very direct impact of the current crisis on American citizens and the United States. The release of this film illustrates the fact that, in just a few months time, this crisis left the mere circles of experts and boardrooms of financial institutions to enter into the daily life of the US citizens.

(2) In the past few days, the complete collapse of Municipal bonds (or « Munis ») illustrates the fact that the crisis is spreading to all the sectors of the US society. This collapse will freeze all public investment projects scheduled by local authorities in the US. It is one of the first big victims of the implosion of « bonds insurers » announced by LEAP/E2020 in the GEAB N°19. It also demonstrates the fact that large banks are now incapable of playing their role of financers of the country’s economic activity. Sources: Financial Times, 02/13/2008 & Bloomberg, 02/14/2008

(3) Source: EconomicIndicators.Gov, Economics & Statistics Administration, US Department of Commerce

(4) See GEAB N°2, 02/15/2006

(5) The first reason that may prevent those « experts » to conceive the « unconceivable », is not a matter of intelligence but a « commercial » problem. Indeed it would compel them to review most of their intellectual principles (their work hypotheses) and their business base (their « clients » would not appreciate to learn that they were on the wrong track all these years).

(6) On this subject, it is worth noticing the very straightforward speech made by the head of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, who recently warned his fellow citizens that the current crisis would downgrade significantly their living standards. Unfortunately, no US leader, including among the Democrats, is able to produce such a speech, knowing that their fellow citizens are hit even harder than the British. Source: The Telegraph, 02/14/2008.

(7) See GEAB N°11, 01/15/2007.

(8) In this 22nd issue of the GEAB, the LEAP/E2020 team gives a set of recommendations helping investors to assess themselves the « American risk » of a country, sector or investment.

(9) The same goes for all those who chose to listen to similar arguments telling them, along the years 2006 and 2007, that it was impossible for the EURUSD exchange rate to go above 1.30, then 1.40, and now 1.50… while waiting 1.70 at the end of the year 2008.

(10) Only « dream merchants » can still imagine that stock markets could improve by the end of the year, while the crisis is speeding up.

(11) It is worth reminding that in January 2008, in just a month, global stock markets saw USD 5,200 billion-worth go up in smoke. Source: China Daily News, 02/10/2008

(12) Even if our anticipations undeniably proved to be right in the past two years concerning the global systemic crisis.

(13) See ‘Sequence 6 : 2nd quarter 2007 – 4th quarter 2009 : « Very Great Depression » in the US, social unrest and growing influence of the army on public management, GEAB N°18, 10/15/2007

(14) Predictions about the failure of dozens of US banks in the coming two years illustrate the scope of upcoming difficulties. Source: Reuters, 02/01/2008

Fidel Retires. Washington Surprised. As Usual.

Fidel Castro
For 49 years Fidel Castro has outfoxed and bamboozled the U.S. government. Ten separate administrations in the White House have been at a total loss in how to deal with Castro: Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush Jr.

Not one of them, with the possible exception of Jimmy Carter, has been willing to do the one thing likely to have worked with Castro and Cuba: open up travel, trade and communication. Instead, kowtowing to the Cuban exiles in Miami and the fear of looking “soft on Communism”, the Republicans and Democrats have let crass political motives and self-serving ideology get in the way of reality. As a result of being blinded by its own immediate interests, Washington hasn’t the slightest idea of what’s going on in Cuba or how the country operates.

Case in point: the upcoming election for President in Cuba. On February 24, the members of the Cuban National Assembly will elect a new president of Cuba. Will it once again be Fidel Castro? Surprising Washington and the American people, but few others around the world, Fidel has today answered that question, saying he will not be a candidate for the office of President and the commander-in-chief.

Is it because of his health? Well, yes, that’s what he says. But there’s more to it than just that. Both Fidel Castro and Raul Castro know that if the success of the Cuban revolution is dependent on one man—or two brothers—it is a failure. It must be able to continue without a Castro at the top. And now it will.

What the U.S. government has failed to recognize—since it likely hasn’t even read Cuba’s constitution—is that when Fidel realized he was too ill to continue to actively lead the country in its day-to-day operations, he did not “hand over power” to his brother Raul; the constitution mandated the transition, not because Raul was Fidel’s brother but because Raul was already the elected First Vice-President of the Cuban Council of State. And it was always intended that this interim position would continue only until the next election by the National Assembly.

Now Castro says he will not seek re-election, though it’s likely he wishes to remain as a member of the Council of State. Common wisdom (sic) in Washington, D.C. is that Raul will continue to run the country as the “new” Fidel. That’s nonsense. Much more likely is that Raul will return to his position as First Vice-President and the Defense Minister, and that the National Assembly—whose members have been elected by the Cuban people—will, with the total support of Fidel and Raul, name a younger man to head the country.

Likely candidates are:

Carlos Lage, the 56 year-old Executive Secretary of the Council of Ministers of Cuba who is often considered to be Cuba’s de facto prime minister. Lage is a former pediatrician who has been actively involved in various aspects of Cuba’s economy and is an expert on the U.S. and its relations with Cuba.

Felipe Pérez Roque, Cuba’s foreign minister, who at the age of 42 is the youngest member of the Cuban cabinet and the only member born after the 1959 revolution. Roque was a leader of student organizations and Fidel’s chief of staff for a decade.

Ricardo Alarcón, the 70-year-old doctor of philosophy who has been president of the National Assembly since 1993. Alarcón was formerly Cuba’s representative to the United Nations, where he was also vice-president of the General Assembly. He was active in Castro’s 26th of July Movement to overthrow Batista, organizing student guerrilla groups.

While Cuba’s National Assembly could elect someone other than one of the three above, it seems likely that it would choose someone that already has considerable experience and respect, and those three all fit the bill.

Alarcón would be an excellent choice. He’s brilliant and often seen as the heir apparent, but at the age of 70 doesn’t quite symbolize a younger generation. Roque at the age of 42 would be a remarkable choice, demonstrating Cuba’s (and Fidel’s) faith in a younger, post-Revolution generation, but our money is on Lage, who at 56 is from a younger generation than Fidel and Raul’s, who has the experience to deal with the economic challenges, and who has the knowledge of the U.S. to handle what will inevitably be changes in Washington’s approach toward Cuba.

We say inevitably because if there’s one thing Washington listens to, it’s capitalists; and U.S. corporations want more and more trade with Cuba, particularly as the U.S. hits economic recession, depression and even what we believe will be GD2 (or GDII if you prefer a closer analogy to World War II).

Yes, that’s Great Depression II, and the more the economy goes down the toilet, the more American companies are going to look for new markets. Why not a market 90 miles from our shore? We predict a new face (for Americans) leading Cuba to meet with the new face (for the entire world) leading the United States.

Update: Well, Chicken Little screwed up. Raul Castro was elected president, a very old general dating back from the Sierra Maestre days now heads Defense, and Lage remains pretty much where he was.

Too bad. The Castro Boys had a chance to make a dramatic change that would truly have thrown the U.S. government for a loop. Instead they kept the old guard in charge–with a Castro at the top.

Granted this means there’s no threat to the embargo. If both Raul and Fidel had left the top levels of government, George W. would have had egg on his face. According to the Helms-Burton Act, nothing changes while a Castro is running things (it doesn’t appear to say anything about a Castro being in the National Assembly). Since a Castro now remains in the top echelon, the embargo remains. And thus Cuba continues to have its excuse for anything wrong in the country. And, let’s face it, the Americans aren’t responsible for everything that doesn’t work.

Perhaps Raul just wants more time to deal with the transition and make sure everything is in place before the next generation takes over. Perhaps. Our money is still on Carlos Lage to run things in the future. But for now, it’s Raul and the old guys. Maybe they just couldn’t bear the thought of walking away while George W. was still in power.

It could truly have been dramatic - and a master stroke. Sigh.

Monbiot on the Biofuel Fantasy

George Monbiot in the Guardian has written what I consider the best, and most accessible, summary of the biofuel fantasy, Apart from used chip fat, there is no such thing as a sustainable biofuel.

George W. Bush - A Man of his Word

George W. has been badly misjudged by many people. He has been accused of acting against his campaign promise in 2000 that he would not be a “nation builder”. Many consider his efforts to create democratic, capitalist governments in Afghanistan and Iraq as “nation building”.

Not so. George W. is a man of principle. He is not a nation builder; he is a “nation destroyer”. He singlehandedly took a country that had one of the lowest standards of living in the world and reduced it to the absolute lowest in the world. And that was only a start.

Recognizing that his mission in Afghanistan was fairly easy, he next moved on to Iraq, where he took the most sophisticated, advanced and secular country in the Middle East and destroyed its infrastructure, governmental system, cultural heritage, health and education services, indeed the entire country from top to bottom.

There are now more than 4,000,000 refugees, 1,000,000 dead and hundreds of thousands maimed in that country. What was once a secular country where neighbors and even families were a mixture of Shia, Sunni, Kurd, Christian and other groups, is now divided into fiefdoms where ethnic and religious groups vie with one another for power and even existence. Nation building? No way. Not from George W. Bush. Not from the man who promised America that he would never build nations.

But George W. wasn’t satisfied with even Iraq. He wanted more. And, by God, he did it. In a breathtaking leap of imagination and courage, he managed to destroy (not build) his own country, gutting its educational and health systems, destroying the financial system (including the worldwide standard the petrodollar), helping banks and other financial institutions throw millions out of their homes, and then, in a stunning burst of inspiration, destroying those very banks and financial institutions as well. Granted, much of what Bush accomplished had been started by Ronald Reagan, but Reagan never had the imagination to take it as far as George W. has.

By destroying the United States, George got a two-fer. He also brought down the most powerful empire the world had ever seen, something no other country, even the Soviet Union, had been able to do. The U.S. Army and Marine Corps have been nearly destroyed, the U.S. is reviled throughout the world, the image of America as the symbol of everything good and moral is gone forever, its once-powerful economy is shattered and the dollar will soon be worthless, not even worth the bits it is imprinted on.

Did George W. stop there? Not this president. Along the way he managed to speed up the possible destruction of the entire planet by fighting international efforts to slow down and reverse global warming and pollution. No planet builder, he.

Is he resting on his laurels? Not yet. He has his heart set on targeting yet another country in which he will not build a nation. That next country is Iran, yet another sophisticated country that he believes deserves to not experience nation building. Bush has just less than a year in which not to build a nation in Iran. Only time will tell if he can succeed.

As promised, no nation building has taken place on George W. Bush’s watch. George W. Bush is a man who stuck to his values and campaign promises. To those who voted for him in 2000 and 2004, we can only say: “Well done. You got what you voted for.”